1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Jeep Willys 2
To start off, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 (160 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Willys 2 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jeep Willys 2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 (210 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Willys 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2002 Jeep Willys 2 | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 60 | Willys 2 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2420 mm |