1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki F1 (67 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki F1 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A 60 (122 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1961 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | A 60 | F1 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 45 L |