1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 (217 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 (265 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
Make | Austin | Alfa Romeo |
Model | A 60 | 166 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 265 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 69 L |