1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 180 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 61 L |