1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 350 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 60 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 60 | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 59 L |
