1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 327 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 61 L |