1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 60 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 60 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 324 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 100.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 84 L |
