1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,775 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 740 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 60 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2775 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 78 L |