1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 60 weights approximately 106 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1961 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 60 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 60 | Rustler |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1586 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1014 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 54 L |
