1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Acadia (284 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Acadia (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2009 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Austin | GMC |
Model | A 60 | Acadia |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 284 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 83 L |