1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2009 Mercury Milan is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Milan (160 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Milan should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Milan weights approximately 805 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Milan (212 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Milan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2009 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | A 60 | Milan |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 212 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 12.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 66 L |