1961 Austin A 99 vs. 1996 Zagato Bravo
To start off, 1996 Zagato Bravo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 99 would be higher.
Because 1961 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Zagato Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Zagato Bravo has automatic transmission and 1961 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1961 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Zagato Bravo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 99 | 1996 Zagato Bravo | |
| Make | Austin | Zagato |
| Model | A 99 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
