1961 Austin A 99 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 353 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 99.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1961 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 99 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 99 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2580 mm |