1961 Austin A 99 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 88 kg more than 1961 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 99. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1961 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1961 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 99 | 2002 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 99 | CTS |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3173 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1618 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 66 L |