1961 Austin A 99 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 99 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1961 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A 99 (221 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (220 Nm). This means 1961 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 99 | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 99 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |