1961 Austin A 99 vs. 2005 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 430 kg more than 1961 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 99 | 2005 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 99 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 342 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2960 mm |
