1961 Austin A 99 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 99.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 99. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1961 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1961 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 99 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Austin | SsangYong |
| Model | A 99 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |
