1961 Austin A 99 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 99 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2012 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1961 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Austin A 99 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 99 BT-50
Year Released 1961 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2604 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 107 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 98 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]