1961 Austin A vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1961 Austin A is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Humber Pullman (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 887 kg more than 1961 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Austin | Humber |
Model | A | Pullman |
Year Released | 1961 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 120 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3330 mm |