1961 Austin A vs. 1956 DKW Munga
To start off, 1961 Austin A is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Austin A (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Austin A should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Munga weights approximately 135 kg more than 1961 Austin A.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1961 Austin A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 1956 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A | Munga |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |
