1961 Austin A vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Triumph 2000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 2000 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1961 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Triumph 2000 (207 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1970 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | A | 2000 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |