1961 Austin A vs. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1961 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 1973 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 8190 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 223 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3220 mm |
