1961 Austin A vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1986 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 30 kg more than 1961 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Austin | Plymouth |
| Model | A | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2470 mm |
