1961 Austin A vs. 1994 Renault Ludo
To start off, 1994 Renault Ludo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Renault Ludo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Renault Ludo (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A weights approximately 130 kg more than 1994 Renault Ludo.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Renault Ludo (107 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm). This means 1994 Renault Ludo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 1994 Renault Ludo | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A | Ludo |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1015 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2750 mm |
