1961 Austin A vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A weights approximately 35 kg more than 1996 Proton 400.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Austin | Proton |
Model | A | 400 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |