1961 Austin A vs. 2000 Opel Corsa
To start off, 2000 Opel Corsa is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Corsa (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Corsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2000 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Austin | Opel |
Model | A | Corsa |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |