1961 Austin A vs. 2001 Nissan Chappo
To start off, 2001 Nissan Chappo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 2,953 cc, 2001 Nissan Chappo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Chappo (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Chappo weights approximately 140 kg more than 1961 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Chappo (359 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Chappo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2001 Nissan Chappo | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A | Chappo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2953 cc |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |