1961 Austin A vs. 2003 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Matiz (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 87 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 2003 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | A | Matiz |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 38 L |
