1961 Austin A vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 ZAZ Wagon (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 ZAZ Wagon should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A weights approximately 400 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Austin | ZAZ |
Model | A | Wagon |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2330 mm |