1961 Austin A vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,597 cc, 2005 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Almera (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A weights approximately 68 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Almera (138 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A | Almera |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1077 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |