1961 Austin A vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2005 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1961 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2005 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Austin | Rover |
Model | A | 75 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |