1961 Austin A vs. 2008 Ford Ka
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A weights approximately 258 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 2008 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A | Ka |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 887 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |
