1961 Austin A vs. 2008 Proton Arena
To start off, 2008 Proton Arena is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A weights approximately 110 kg more than 2008 Proton Arena.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Proton Arena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Proton Arena (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2008 Proton Arena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2008 Proton Arena | |
Make | Austin | Proton |
Model | A | Arena |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |