1961 Austin A vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. In terms of performance, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
| Make | Austin | Smart |
| Model | A | Ultimate 112 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |
