1961 Austin A vs. 2009 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Avenger (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Avenger (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2009 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A | Avenger |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |