1961 Austin A vs. 2009 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2009 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Austin | Lincoln |
Model | A | MKS |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |