1961 Austin A vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Austin | Smart |
Model | A | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 81.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 33 L |