1961 Austin A vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | A | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
