1961 Austin A vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (68 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (115 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 46 L |
