1961 Austin A vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A.
Because 1961 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A | Civic |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |