1961 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1949 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1166 kg more than 1961 Austin Mini Cooper.
Because 1949 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin Mini Cooper | 1949 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Mini Cooper | 62 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 584 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3210 mm |
