1961 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2008 Nissan Livina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1821 kg more than 1961 Austin Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Livina (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin Mini Cooper. (74 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Livina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin Mini Cooper | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Mini Cooper | Livina |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Top Speed | 135 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 584 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 52 L |
