1961 Austin Princess vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin Princess weights approximately 202 kg more than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin Princess. (252 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin Princess | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | Princess | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2499 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1978 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 70 L |
