1961 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1961 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin Princess.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin Princess (252 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1961 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin Princess | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Princess | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 65 L |