1961 BMW 501 vs. 1969 Rover 2000
To start off, 1969 Rover 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Rover 2000 (106 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 BMW 501 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1969 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 BMW 501 (182 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Rover 2000. (172 Nm). This means 1961 BMW 501 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 501 | 1969 Rover 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 501 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 172 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 54 L |