1961 BMW 501 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (103 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 BMW 501 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Because 1961 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 BMW 501 (182 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 1961 BMW 501 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 501 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 501 | 200 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 103 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2510 mm |