1961 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 BMW 501 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1961 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 BMW 501 (182 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 1961 BMW 501 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 501 | 2000 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 501 | Sebring |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |