1961 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 980 kg more than 1961 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 BMW 501. (182 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 BMW 501.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 501 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 501 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 338 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3510 mm |