1961 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501.
Because 1961 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 BMW 501. (182 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 BMW 501.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 BMW 501 | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 501 | SS |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
