1961 BMW 501 vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Ford Falcon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Falcon (220 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1961 BMW 501. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Falcon weights approximately 170 kg more than 1961 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 BMW 501. (182 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 BMW 501.
Compare all specifications:
1961 BMW 501 | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 501 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 357 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 59 L |